arXiv AI By Siegfried Handschuh, G\"otz-Henrik Wiegand, Lorena Raichle

Hybrid AI Patterns: Thirteen Ways to Couple Language Models with Rules, and How to Choose Among Them

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The article "Hybrid AI Patterns: Thirteen Ways to Couple Language Models with Rules, and How to Choose Among Them" presents a catalogue of thirteen design patterns for integrating language models with rule-based systems. It details each pattern’s intent, motivation, applicability, participants, collaborations, consequences, implementation, known uses, and related patterns, and identifies five invariants and five failure patterns that apply to all combinations. A decision guide is provided to help select an appropriate pattern based on problem context, supported by measurements of performance and design costs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
5d ago

Towards Portable Specification of the Agent Harness

The paper proposes a portable specification framework for the infrastructure—called the harness—that surrounds large language models. It decomposes the harness into eight functional components, enabling consistent specification and comparison across systems. The authors argue that recording which model ran in which harness is essential because different configurations can drastically alter performance and expose varying attack surfaces, and current model or agent cards do not capture this sequence of effective configurations.

By Nicolas Gertler, Claudio Novelli, Luciano Floridi
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Rule-Based Languages for Neurosymbolic AI

The article surveys rule‑based languages—Datalog, answer set, and probabilistic logic programs—used as the symbolic component of neurosymbolic AI systems. It examines these languages across semantics, expressiveness, neural integration, and evaluation mechanisms, and analyzes over 50 recent systems in databases, machine learning, vision, and robotics. A decision matrix links application scenarios to required features, and the paper concludes with open research problems.

By Stefania Dumbrava, Efthymia Tsamoura
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration

The paper "Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration" discusses how Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short for industrial product configuration due to their probabilistic nature, which conflicts with the need for syntactically valid, semantically consistent outputs that align with extensive feature and rule knowledge bases. It proposes Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI as a promising solution, outlining three integration strategies—hybrid inference, hybrid fine‑tuning, and hybrid training—and presents a taxonomy of these approaches. The authors describe their efforts to implement a NeSy-based configuration copilot, derive practical design choices for trustworthy AI deployment in engineering settings, and highlight key research challenges, especially scaling NeSy methods from academic prototypes to full‑scale industrial configurators.

By Danilo Valerio, Philipp Kogler, Stefan Bischof, Thomas Hubauer, Huzefa Rangwala
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 28

Adversary Brains: Hypothesis-Based Logical Signatures for Threat Actor Detection with LLMs

The paper introduces the concept of an "adversary brain," an LLM-based model that represents a threat actor’s behavior as an evolving logical signature. These signatures function as continuous detection mechanisms, matching activity patterns of campaigns rather than single indicators, and are built using the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses framework extended to thousands of hypotheses. Language models enable the creation, evaluation, and updating of these brains, allowing them to identify new indicators such as fresh command‑and‑control domains and transform unknown threats into known ones.

By Gadi Evron
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Neuro-Symbolic Drive: Rule-Grounded Faithful Reasoning for Driving VLAs

arXiv:2606. 23938v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Driving VLA models incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are attractive because they leverage pretrained VLM representations and expose intermediate decisions in natural language, yet current rationales often lack the step-by-step decision semantics needed to keep the rationale causally connected to the planned motion.

By Xiangbo Gao, Xiukun Huang, Boyu Lu, Junge Zhang, Mengjie Mao, Jiachen Li, Wei Xiong, Zhengzhong Tu