arXiv Machine Learning By Gadi Evron

Adversary Brains: Hypothesis-Based Logical Signatures for Threat Actor Detection with LLMs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces the concept of an "adversary brain," an LLM-based model that represents a threat actor’s behavior as an evolving logical signature. These signatures function as continuous detection mechanisms, matching activity patterns of campaigns rather than single indicators, and are built using the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses framework extended to thousands of hypotheses. Language models enable the creation, evaluation, and updating of these brains, allowing them to identify new indicators such as fresh command‑and‑control domains and transform unknown threats into known ones.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

When AI Investigators Cannot Trust Their Tools: Conflict-Aware Evidence Verification for Cyber Threat Investigation

The paper investigates how large language model (LLM) agents that triage security alerts can be misled when the detection tools they rely on provide conflicting or incorrect evidence. By corrupting up to three of four heterogeneous detectors on the CIC-IDS2017 dataset, the authors show that naive LLM investigators become highly fragile, with accuracy dropping to as low as 13% and abstaining on up to 63% of flows. They propose Conflict‑Aware Evidence Verification (CAV), which combines an equal‑weight vote, an evidence‑conflict gate, and a nearest‑neighbour trust check; CAV consistently outperforms naive investigators across all corruption scenarios, improving accuracy to 84–88% when three detectors are corrupted while only querying the LLM on 0.4% of clean traffic.

By Yuchen Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Walking on the DARKSIDE

arXiv:2608.23370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) recognise patterns but do not natively track the path of exclusions that a coherent discourse demands. When an input rests...

By Aldo Gangemi, Emanuele Bottazzi