arXiv AI By Omar Al-Refai, Yadira Colunga Reyes, Celeste Riley, Eman Hammad

Human-AI Interactions and the Psychological Triad: A Multi-Domain Survey of Cognitive, Behavioral, and Emotional Impacts

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 17

Human Resilience in the AI Era -- What Machines Can't Replace

The paper argues that the rapid pace of AI-driven change creates an adaptation gap, making human resilience a crucial capability for the AI era. Resilience is defined as the ability to absorb disruption while maintaining effective action and agency, and is examined at psychological, social, and organizational levels. The authors link resilience research with AI-in-the-loop experiments, showing that AI assistance can boost productivity, empathy, and calibrated reliance, and propose a socio‑technical agenda for education, workplace design, governance, and evaluation.

By Shaoshan Liu, Anina Schwarzenbach, Yiyu Shi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

The Psychological Costs of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Software Engineering

The article examines the psychological costs that software professionals face when organizations adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in software engineering workflows. Through a case study involving 21 interviews at a large software development services company, the authors identify several negative impacts—accountability anxiety, craft identity disruption, erosion of meaning and satisfaction, increased cognitive load and workload, and uncertainty distress. They also describe how practitioners cope by restoring control, adopting protective adaptations, or absorbing the costs, arguing that AI adoption should be viewed as a human transition rather than merely a technological or organizational change.

By Adam Alami, Elda Paja, Abhishek Tiwari
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Significant Other AI: Identity, Memory, and Emotional Regulation as Long-Term Relational Intelligence

The paper proposes a new class of relational AI called Significant Other Artificial Intelligence (SO‑AI), designed to emulate the stabilizing role of human significant others by providing identity awareness, long‑term memory, proactive support, narrative co‑construction, and ethical boundary enforcement. It outlines a conceptual architecture featuring an anthropomorphic interface, a relational cognition layer, and a governance layer, and presents a research agenda for evaluating identity stability, interaction patterns, narrative development, and sociocultural impact. The authors argue that SO‑AI could fill the relational anchor gap many people experience today, offering a blueprint for responsibly augmenting long‑term, identity‑bearing partnerships between humans and AI.

By Sung Park