How Much Regularization Survives Averaging? Update Masking in Federated Learning
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 10916v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper introduces range regularization for federated learning with linear systematic components to enhance statistical accuracy and induce cross-client regularity conducive to quantization, coding, and resource efficiency.
arXiv:2607. 04170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training without data sharing, but suffers from statistical heterogeneity across clients, leading to client drift, poor generalization, and sharp minima compared to centralized training.
arXiv:2508. 12042v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) allows collaborative training of machine learning models across multiple parties without sharing raw data.
arXiv:2607. 01474v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Class imbalance poses a critical challenge in federated learning (FL), where underrepresented classes suffer from poor predictive performance yet cannot be addressed by standard centralized techniques due to privacy and heterogeneity constraints.
arXiv:2607. 14731v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local SGD, also known as Federated Averaging, is a widely used distributed optimization algorithm.
The paper investigates why the SCAFFOLD algorithm, designed to be robust to data heterogeneity in federated learning, often underperforms compared to the simpler FedAvg. It identifies the presence of Edge of Stability (EoS) dynamics and progressive sharpening as key factors, showing that both algorithms exhibit EoS behavior across various architectures and hyperparameters. Crucially, the study finds that at the EoS, SCAFFOLD’s ability to estimate the global gradient deteriorates, as indicated by a weakened correlation between sharpness and gradient estimation error, explaining its limited practical advantage.