arXiv AI By Tak Ho Alex Li, Kaijie Liu, Lik-Hang Lee, Kin Chung Ho, Ping Shum, Michael K. Ng

HoloAegis: Frozen Representation, Topological Inference --- Minimally Parametric Safety Manifolds and Their Capability Boundaries for LLM Guardrails

Read the original on arXiv AI →

HoloAegis is a minimally parametric topological inference framework that uses frozen representations to map text onto the unit sphere and makes decisions via Gibbs‑Boltzmann free‑energy differences over pre‑computed anchor centroids. On a frozen three‑benchmark protocol, it matches WildGuard‑7B on toxicity, outperforms it on harmful behaviors, but underperforms on oversafety detection, while ShieldGemma‑2B fails on indirect harms. The study demonstrates that geometric guardrails can substitute for LLM judges in some cases and must defer to them in others, with anchor banks reducing score variance and boundary displacement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

From Persistence to Survival: Hypothesis Testing, Effect Sizes and Vectorisation for Topological Features

arXiv:2606. 11911v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Persistence diagrams are common representations in topological data analysis, but they do not naturally live in a vector space, and the statistical tools developed for comparing them have largely evolved separately from those used for downstream prediction.

By Juliette Murris, Bernadette Stolz, Karsten Borgwardt
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

MindTopo: Can Foundation Models Reason in Topological Space?

MindTopo is a benchmark that tests foundation models on topological reasoning, covering five cognitive properties—continuity, separation, order, enclosure, and knots—across two cognitive levels: reasoning and planning. It contains 11,030 instances from 13 procedurally generated task types, and evaluates 14 multimodal large language models, including agent configurations with image and video generation. Results show that models perform better on reasoning than planning, and even the best model lags far behind human performance, with fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning improving reasoning more than planning.

By Yunfei Ge, Anbang Liu, Qineng Wang, Johnalbert Garnica, Jianwen Lyu, Zihan Wang, Reuben Tan, Jianfeng Gao, Ruohan Zhang, Yining Hong, Jiajun Wu, Manling Li