arXiv:2605. 13672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-shot classification (FSC) is widely used for learning from limited labeled data, yet most evaluations implicitly assume that target concepts are independent of contextual cues.
By Giries Abu Ayoub, Morad Tukan, Loay Mualem
Recent Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have achieved remarkable progress in audio perceptual tasks across individual acoustic layers, including speech, sound, and music. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate these layers in isolation, overlooking the complex contextual relationships that arise when multiple acoustic sources co-occur in real-world auditory scenes.
UniAE-MoE is a unified audio encoder that uses a Mixture-of-Experts architecture to model cross‑domain audio representations. It integrates encoder components from Qwen2‑Audio and Audio‑Flamingo 3, enhances them with SwiGLU and shared experts, and applies a two‑stage instruction‑tuning strategy along with task‑specific data scaling. The model achieves state‑of‑the‑art results on the XARES‑LLM benchmark (0.802) and tops the Interspeech 2026 Audio Encoder Capability Challenge, demonstrating strong generalization across speech, music, and general audio tasks.
By Shengbo Cai, Zhisheng Zhang, Zichao Nie, Jing Peng, Jingran Xie, Zhiyong Wu
arXiv:2606. 07033v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-vocabulary audio-visual event localization (OV-AVEL) jointly models audio-visual cues to recognize and temporally localize events, including categories unseen during training.
By Zhe Yang, Ruyi Zhang, Hongtao Chen, Wenrui Li, Hengyu Man, Wangmeng Zuo, Xiaopeng Fan
arXiv:2606. 29901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sound event detection (SED) is a core module for acoustic environmental analysis, yet its performance is often limited by scarce labeled data.
By Nian Shao, Xian Li, Xiaofei Li
AVC-Reward introduces an event‑centric framework for evaluating audio‑video consistency, breaking down scenes into individual audio and visual events and assessing them at three levels: global narrative harmony, event‑level temporal synchronization, and fine‑grained attribute alignment. The metric, instantiated as a trainable reward model, is validated against human judgments using the AVC‑Benchmark, which contains diverse positive and negative samples from various generation models. AVC‑Reward outperforms existing automatic methods, offers interpretable failure localization, and enhances consistency when used as a reinforcement‑learning signal.
By Yuruo Wu, Kaihang Pan, Kai Shen, Jiacheng Li, Shuyuan Tu, Jisheng Dang, Li Tuoyu, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang