arXiv AI By Zhichao Hou, Xitong Zhang, Wei Wang, Charu C. Aggarwal, Xiaorui Liu

Harnessing Trust in Directed Graphs: Redefining Robustness of Graph Learning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper reexamines robustness in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) by focusing on directed graphs, which have been largely ignored in prior work. It introduces a more realistic attack setting for directed graphs and proposes a simple message‑passing defense that can be added as a plug‑in layer. The authors demonstrate that leveraging the trust signals inherent in link directions can significantly enhance GNN robustness, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance while maintaining strong clean accuracy against both transfer and adaptive attacks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Kernel-Complexity Edge Sanitization for Training-Free Defense against Structural Graph Attacks

Kernel-Complexity Edge Sanitization (KCES) is a training‑free, model‑agnostic defense for Graph Neural Networks that identifies and removes edges with high Kernel‑Complexity (KC) scores, which are indicative of structural influence on the graph kernel complexity metric. KCES leverages a theoretical upper bound on GNN test error derived from the graph Gram matrix to compute edge‑specific KC scores, pruning edges that are empirically enriched with adversarial perturbations. The method is computationally efficient, scalable to large graphs, and consistently outperforms representative robust baselines across diverse attack settings without requiring retraining.

By Yaning Jia, Shenyang Deng, Yaoqing Yang, Chiyu Ma, Wenxuan Xu, Soroush Vosoughi