arXiv:2601. 22443v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Can a diffusion model trained on bedrooms recover human faces?
By Jing Jia, Wei Yuan, Sifan Liu, Liyue Shen, Guanyang Wang
arXiv:2607. 19333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based methods have achieved remarkable empirical success in solving inverse problems.
By Yuchen Jiao, Na Li, Changxiao Cai, Yuxin Chen, Gen Li
arXiv:2602. 23214v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Plug-and-Play diffusion prior (PnPDP) frameworks have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving imaging inverse problems by treating pretrained generative models as modular priors.
By Chenhe Du, Xuanyu Tian, Qing Wu, Muyu Liu, Jingyi Yu, Hongjiang Wei, Yuyao Zhang
arXiv:2605.11506v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Score-based diffusion models achieve state-of-the-art performance for inverse problems, but their practical deployment is hindered by long inferenc...
By Julio Oscanoa, Irmak Sivgin, Cagan Alkan, Daniel Ennis, John Pauly, Mert Pilanci, Shreyas Vasanawala
arXiv:2511. 17038v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: From a Bayesian perspective, score-based diffusion solves inverse problems through joint inference, embedding the likelihood with the prior to guide the sampling process.
By Hao Chen, Renzheng Zhang, Scott S. Howard
FB‑GDM is a fully‑Bayesian guided diffusion method that eliminates the need for task‑specific hyperparameter tuning in linear inverse problems. It derives a closed‑form conditional score from a Gaussian approximation of ΦGDM, treating two precision parameters as latent variables inferred via variational inference at each reverse step. Experiments on CelebA‑HQ show that FB‑GDM outperforms ΦGDM at its nominal setting, matches a ground‑truth‑calibrated oracle within 0.1 dB, and remains robust to changes in the forward operator, noise level, or image distribution without hallucinations.
By Gatien S\'eguy (SATIE), Thomas Rodet (SATIE)