arXiv AI By Fan Yuan, Yuchen Yan, Yifan Jiang, Haoran Zhao, Tao Feng, Jinyan Chen, Yanwei Lou, Wenqi Zhang, Weiming Lu, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, Yongliang Shen

GSM8K-V: Can Vision Language Models Solve Grade School Math Word Problems in Visual Contexts

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces GSM8K‑V, a new benchmark that converts the GSM8K grade‑school math word problems into multi‑image sequences while preserving semantic equivalence. It requires vision‑language models to extract quantities through visual perception and reconstruct reasoning chains by integrating implicit cues across scenes. Evaluation of 34 VLMs shows a large modality gap: most models score above 90 % on text, but the best reaches only 59 % on GSM8K‑V, highlighting a distinct challenge in implicit visual inference.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

Perception or Reasoning? Diagnosing and Tackling Reinforcement Learning Bottlenecks in VLMs

The paper introduces Perception and Reasoning Attribution (PARA), a method that quantifies how much of a vision‑language model’s errors can be fixed by better perception versus stronger reasoning. PARA reveals that reinforcement learning (RL) benefits more from improving reasoning than perception, and motivates a new group‑relative attention distillation objective called GRAD. GRAD directly guides weaker rollouts toward the visual attention patterns of the best rollouts, consistently boosting performance across multiple model scales and benchmarks.

By Zeyuan Yang, Zhuohao Chen, Jiaben Chen, Yao Zhang, Maohao Shen, Chuang Gan
arXiv AI
Aug 24

StateSight: Benchmarking Latent Spatial-State Reconstruction in Vision-Language Models

StateSight is a new benchmark designed to isolate and evaluate the ability of vision‑language models to reconstruct latent spatial structure from a single image. It consists of three procedurally generated task families—cube‑net opposite‑face reasoning, occluded cube‑tower counting, and 4‑neighbor connected‑component counting—each with 300 deterministic prompts and exact‑match scoring. The benchmark also includes a companion dataset, StateSight‑Steps, with 900 image‑text examples and 3,600 intermediate visual states to aid analysis of reconstruction errors.

By Michelle Lin
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Beyond Bag-of-Words: Diagnosing Compositional Binding Failures in Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces Auto-Comp, a fully automated, concept-driven pipeline that generates photorealistic compositional benchmarks for vision‑language models. Auto‑Comp creates paired Minimal and Contextual samples for each concept, enabling isolation of core binding abilities from visio‑linguistic complexity. Evaluations across 25 models reveal consistent failures in attribute and relational binding, with context helping relational tasks but hindering attribute tasks due to visual clutter.

By Cristian Sbrolli, Toshihiko Yamasaki, Matteo Matteucci
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 16

Not Another Text Benchmark: Putting the "Visual" Back in Visual Question Answering for Large Video Models

The paper introduces three new vision‑centric evaluation benchmarks—temporal frame retrieval, video future prediction, and causal memory distortion—to assess visual question answering in large video models. Unlike traditional benchmarks that rely on text-based multiple choice questions, these tasks require models to reason directly from visual inputs. The authors find that current state‑of‑the‑art models struggle with visual queries, highlighting a gap in visual understanding that future research should address.

By Rwiddhi Chakraborty (Oliver), Yinong (Oliver), Wang, Cheng Zhang, Fan Bai, Zhuoran You, Michael Kampffmeyer, Yong Jae Lee, Fernando De la Torre, Robert Jenssen