Personalized language-model assistants are often evaluated through a memory lens: can a model recall preferences users have explicitly stated in dialogue? More comprehensive personalization demands a harder capability -- inferring what users care about from the multimodal traces they naturally leave behind.
arXiv:2602. 12394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized prompting offers large opportunities for deploying large language models (LLMs) to diverse users, yet existing prompt optimization methods primarily focus on task-level optimization while largely overlooking user-specific preferences and latent constraints of individual users.
By Yuchen Ma, Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Xiaonan Luo, Xiangliang Zhang, Stefan Feuerriegel
MiCRo is a two‑stage framework that improves personalized preference learning for large language models. It first uses a context‑aware mixture model to capture diverse human preferences from large binary preference datasets, then applies an online routing strategy to dynamically adjust mixture weights based on context, reducing ambiguity. Experiments on multiple datasets show that MiCRo captures diverse preferences and enhances downstream personalization.
By Jingyan Shen, Jiarui Yao, Rui Yang, Yifan Sun, Feng Luo, Rui Pan, Tong Zhang, Han Zhao
The paper introduces ReaLMem, a benchmark built from authentic multi‑year personal visual archives with first‑person annotations, designed to evaluate AI systems on factual recall, persona inference, and predictive personalization. It also proposes ChronoProfiler, a temporal‑weighting module that calculates stability scores for user attributes to resolve preference conflicts and enhance personalized decision making. Experiments with multimodal large language models and memory systems show that predictive personalization remains the hardest task, highlight performance gaps, and demonstrate that temporally informed representations significantly improve personalization.
By Wenqi Zhou, Zhuorui Yu, Kaiao Wen, Hao Zheng, Xinyi Zheng, Peiran Wu, Enmin Zhou, Chi-Hao Wu, Junxiao Shen
The paper introduces VIBE‑Bench, a new benchmark designed to test personalized large language models (PLLMs) in a regime where user profile cues and query‑specific preferences do not share the same conceptual space, a situation termed profile‑preference conceptual misalignment (PRCM). VIBE‑Bench contains 3,504 personas, 12,239 dialogues, and a manually verified gold test set, and includes two psychology‑grounded tasks that require cross‑concept preference reasoning beyond surface semantic overlap. Experiments show that existing PLLMs largely depend on shallow semantic correlations and struggle to learn robust cross‑concept mappings, highlighting PRCM as a distinct failure mode for personalization models.
By Yiwen Jiang, Yang Deng, Stephanie Fong, Zimu Wang, Yaling Shen, Wei Feng, Hongxi Yang, Xiangyu Zhao, Zhongxing Xu, Deval Mehta, Xuelian Cheng, Zongyuan Ge
arXiv:2603.04191v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users may share individual preferences over extended interactio...
By Qianyun Guo, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi