arXiv:2604. 02721v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Competitive programming remains one of the last few human strongholds in coding against AI.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 00017v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training language model agents for multi-agent strategic interaction presents a core difficulty: the quality of any action may depend on future events that never materialize, on moves that violate game rules, or on decisions made by other players.
Agentick is a unified benchmark for sequential decision‑making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents on 37 procedurally generated tasks across six capability categories, four difficulty levels, and five observation modalities via a single Gymnasium‑compatible interface. It includes a Coding API, oracle reference policies, pre‑built SFT datasets, a composable agent harness, and a live leaderboard. An evaluation of 27 configurations and over 90,000 episodes shows no single approach dominates, with GPT‑5 mini leading overall, PPO excelling in planning and multi‑agent tasks, and the reasoning harness boosting LLM performance by 3‑10×, while ASCII observations outperform natural language.
The paper reports a specialized training pipeline for large language models to excel in competitive programming, combining problem curation, synthetic reasoning traces, supervised fine‑tuning, and reinforcement learning. Using 22,000 curated problems, the authors train two models—Nemotron‑3‑Nano‑CC (30B) and Nemotron‑3‑Ultra‑CC (550B)—and introduce GenCorrect, a test‑time refinement strategy. On the IOI 2025 benchmark, Nano‑CC scores 468 points with GenCorrect, surpassing the gold‑medal threshold, while Ultra‑CC reaches 502; in IOI 2026, a competition‑specific Ultra‑CC system scores 535.4, exceeding both the gold threshold and the top human score of 498.27, marking the first AI system to outscore the highest‑scoring human contestant on an IOI problem set.
arXiv:2609.16096v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model coding agents have recently become useful for software tasks, but weaker or open-weight agents still struggle to reliably interp...
arXiv:2606. 07682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments.
AgentRM proposes a generalizable reward model to guide LLM-based agents during test-time search, outperforming direct policy fine-tuning. Three reward modeling strategies—explicit, implicit, and LLM-as-a-judge—are explored, and AgentRM improves base policy performance by an average of 8.8 points across nine tasks, surpassing top general agents by 4.0 points. It also shows strong weak-to-strong generalization and can boost specialized agents, with plans to release code for further research.