arXiv:2606. 17459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is a growing research priority, yet existing benchmarks focus on isolated cognitive tasks such as reasoning, knowledge retrieval, and economic rationality in stylized settings.
By Yuyang Dai, Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Zhuohan Xie
arXiv:2608. 08621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Running a business is a challenging form of intelligent work.
By Yijun Pan, Yukun Lian, Kunyu Shi, Junbo Li, Hongwei Xue, Sicong Xie, Guannan Zhang, Xiaoying Xing
arXiv:2607. 26220v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer natural-language flexibility for automated requirements elicitation but frequently generate structurally invalid requirements and logical inconsistencies, lacking formal correctness guarantees.
By Ahmed Ibrahim
Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer natural-language flexibility for automated requirements elicitation but frequently generate structurally invalid requirements and logical inconsistencies, lacking formal correctness guarantees. Objectives: This study aims to eliminate logical inconsistencies and enforce structural conformance in LLM-generated requirements while quantifying the LLM's pre-validation decision uncertainty within a formal domain model.
arXiv:2603. 14805v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Enterprise software organizations accumulate critical institutional knowledge - architectural decisions, deployment procedures, compliance policies, incident playbooks - yet this knowledge remains trapped in formats designed for human interpretation.
By Gal Bakal
arXiv:2606. 15575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizational knowledge is fragmented across a variety of software systems, tacit expertise, and manual documents that have traditionally been designed for human consumption.
By Anne S. R. Marx, Ricardo M. Avelino, Torbj{\o}rn Netland, Mennatallah El-Assady