arXiv Computation and Language By Md. Nesarul Hoque, Md Hanif Seddiqui, Miskatul Anwara, Rudra Pratap Deb Nath

From Perpetrators' Digital Footprints to Behavioral Communities: An Ontology-Driven Framework for Bengali Cyberbullying Analysis--- FULL VERSION

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces ODCBNA, an ontology-driven framework for analyzing Bengali cyberbullying that integrates ontology design, knowledge graph construction, behavioral modeling, community detection, and influence modeling. Using the BenCoDiC corpus, it identifies 1,063 perpetrators, builds a 64‑dimensional behavioral profile for each, and constructs a weighted network with 27,554 edges. Louvain clustering reveals six communities and 27 sub‑communities, with Video, Impact, and User Profile features driving similarity, and influence analysis shows modest gains across communities with various seed‑selection methods.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

BenCoDiC: A Large-Scale Contextual Cyberbullying Corpus for Bengali Political News Discourse FULL VERSION

The paper introduces BenCoDiC, a large Bengali cyberbullying corpus focused on political news discourse. It contains 50,250 textual instances from 100 YouTube videos, preserving caption–comment–reply relationships and organized via a nine‑dimensional star schema. A two‑tier human annotation process achieved high reliability (Fleiss' κ = 0.86, Krippendorff's α = 0.86), and transformer experiments show that adding conversational context modestly improves classification over isolated text.

By Md. Nesarul Hoque, Rudra Pratap Deb Nath, Umme Salma, Shima Chakraborty, Md. Hanif Seddiqui
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

Do Social Patterns Hold in Synthetic Data? Analyzing Cyberbullying Dynamics in LLM-Generated and Authentic Dialogues

The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can generate synthetic cyberbullying conversations that replicate the social dynamics of real interactions. Using a comprehensive framework, the authors compare authentic dialogues with synthetic ones from GPT, Grok, and LLaMA across structural, linguistic, affective, and temporal dimensions, and conduct human evaluations of realism. Results show that while LLMs preserve high‑level interaction patterns, they systematically distort finer‑grained social phenomena, with model‑specific biases such as GPT’s suppression of harmful content and Grok’s amplification of aggression.

By Arefeh Kazemi, Hamza Qadeer, Sinan Asci, Joachim Wagner, Brian Davis