arXiv Machine Learning By Lisette Esp\'in-Noboa, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Pak-Hang Wong, Erich Prem, Meike Zehlike, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Fariba Karimi

From Network Inequality to Network Fairness: A Perspective on Responsible Decision-Making

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The article discusses how social networks influence decision-making and opportunity distribution, noting that network-generating mechanisms often mirror existing inequalities and can amplify disparities when used in technology. It identifies ten network effects that bias the link between intended measurements and observed data, using academic hiring as a case study to show that network biases can be neither inherently harmful nor beneficial. The authors argue for a comprehensive, networked fairness framework that incorporates both distributive and procedural justice and involves all stakeholders.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Beyond Procedure: Substantive Fairness in Conformal Prediction

arXiv:2602. 16794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored.

By Pengqi Liu, Zijun Yu, Mouloud Belbahri, Arthur Charpentier, Masoud Asgharian, Jesse C. Cresswell