arXiv AI By Saimon Amanuel Tsegai (Daphne), Alex Kantchelian (Daphne), Danfeng (Daphne), Yao, Peng Gao

From Investigation Failures to Reliable SOC Agents: Understanding and Improving LLM-Based Alert Triage

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces ALERT‑BENCH, a benchmark that simulates enterprise security telemetry and evaluates how large‑language‑model agents triage alerts. Five common reasoning strategies—single‑pass tool use, iterative retrieval, sampled investigations, self‑review, and explicit verification—were tested on 1,247 alerts from a multi‑stage attack scenario, each missing at least 40.4% of attack‑related alerts. Building on these findings, the authors propose AIDA, a multi‑agent framework that enforces explicit decision proposals, independent challenges, and stronger evidence requirements, achieving an F1 score of 0.958 and reducing false‑negative alerts from 40.4% to 3.1% while escalating 18.4% to analysts.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

DiagChain: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Evidence-Grounded Attack Chain Reconstruction

arXiv:2608. 03591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a promising approach to attack chain reconstruction by retrieving and interpreting heterogeneous telemetry to infer ordered attacker actions.

By Xuyang Liu, Yibin Han, Zhenwei Zhang, Kai Chang, Zhiwei Xu, Tian Qiu, Weixian Deng, Jiabao Gao, Xiaolin Peng, Hai Wan, Xibin Zhao
arXiv AI
Jul 31

SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response

arXiv:2607. 26791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly adopted in real-world security operations with access to host artifacts and command-line interfaces (CLIs), making it critical to thoroughly assess their security capabilities.

By Lehan Wang, Boli Chen, Ruixue Ding, Pengjun Xie, Jinwei Huang, Zhendong Liu, Shuo Wang, Tao Lei, Xin Ouyang, Xiaomeng Li
arXiv AI
3d ago

AgentEval: Evidence-Bounded Assessment of Stateful Agents

AgentEval is a system that tracks a contract-bound assessment record throughout a stateful agent’s tool execution, capturing state, events, and evidence to determine whether obligations are satisfied, violated, or unresolved. In 32 tool‑world administrations, independent checks confirmed all 30 complete episodes, while controlled interventions on 48 evidence views uncovered 36 binding faults that hash‑only checks missed. A public‑benchmark study on 192 held‑out executions identified ten completed subgoals within broader task failures and highlighted the impact of missing evidence on overall task success.

By Ruiqi Gao (Alibaba Cloud, Alibaba Group)
arXiv AI
Oct 1

APTInvestBench: Evaluating Autonomous APT Investigation under Varying Telemetry

APTInvestBench is a benchmark that evaluates how well autonomous agents can investigate advanced persistent threats (APTs) when faced with different telemetry settings. It contains 370 cases derived from 56 attack reconstructions, totaling 16.4 million log records, and tests agents on seven SOC-inspired telemetry conditions. The benchmark measures evidence acquisition and formal citation support, revealing that while overall coverage drops only slightly when telemetry is limited, a significant portion of actions lose sufficient citation support, highlighting instability in agent performance.

By Yu Wang, Shuhao Li, Tao Yin, Ziyang Li, Xueying Zhao, Peishuai Sun, Jiang Xie