Hugging Face Trending Papers

From Global Benchmarks to Local Evaluations: Benchmarking LLMs for the German Public Sector

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Public institutions face a persistent challenge in selecting LLMs suited to their specific context. Existing benchmarks, however, are of limited use as they primarily reflect English-language and US-centric settings, and often only evaluate task performance.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutch

arXiv:2608. 09925v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts.

By Laurens Samson, Iva Gornishka, Gossa L\^o, Yuki M. Asano, Sennay Ghebreab
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

arXiv:2511. 05613v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities.

By Anka Reuel, Avijit Ghosh, Jenny Chim, Andrew Tran, Yanan Long, Jennifer Mickel, Usman Gohar, Srishti Yadav, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Mowafak Allaham, Hossein A. Rahmani, Mubashara Akhtar, Felix Friedrich, Robert Scholz, Michael Alexander Riegler, Jan Batzner, Eliya Habba, Arushi Saxena, Anastassia Kornilova, Kevin Wei, Prajna Soni, Yohan Mathew, Kevin Klyman, Jeba Sania, Subramanyam Sahoo, Olivia Beyer Bruvik, Pouya Sadeghi, Sujata Goswami, Angelina Wang, Yacine Jernite, Zeerak Talat, Stella Biderman, Mykel Kochenderfer, Sanmi Koyejo, Irene Solaiman
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study

As users increasingly turn to Large Language Models (LLMs) for information and advice on political matters, particularly during election periods, the political preferences expressed by these systems have become a matter of public interest. Prior research has shown that interactions with LLMs can influence users' political attitudes and choices, raising questions about how these models themselves evaluate political actors.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 2

Language Equality has a Price: A Systematic Investigation of Multi-turn LLM Performance for EU-24+

We evaluate large language models (LLMs) as language agents playing goal-directed dialogue games in self-play across 30 languages: the 24 official EU languages plus six others. Unlike static or preference-based evaluation, this paradigm is multi-turn, reference-free and programmatically scored, and because the game mechanics are language-agnostic it extends to a new language by localising a fixed set of prompt and word-list files.