arXiv Machine Learning By Viki Peeva, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Framework for Grouping Local Process Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 04856v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local Process Models (LPMs) are an underexplored concept in process mining.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 2

Automated Event Log Generation from Unstructured Text Using Finetuned LLMs

The paper introduces a scalable framework that uses finetuned large language models (LLMs) to translate unstructured textual resources into structured event logs for process mining. By creating a new text-to-log dataset and finetuning LLMs on it, the authors demonstrate that the resulting models produce high‑fidelity event logs, outperforming few‑shot or zero‑shot prompting methods. This approach enables previously unused organizational data, such as incident tickets and manuals, to be incorporated into process mining workflows.

By Maximilian Seeth, Gabriel Marques Tavares, Daniel Schuster
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Resolution limits for process comparison from event data

The paper examines how event logs used in process mining can fail to reveal concurrent versus sequential activities, using a hospital example where blood tests and imaging may occur simultaneously or in alternating order. It demonstrates that standard stochastic language approaches only expose the assumptions of their discovery algorithms, often misrepresenting concurrency. The authors argue that the key to distinguishing concurrent behavior lies in the choice of recorded data—such as precise start and end times or object‑centric ordering—rather than simply increasing sample size.

By Antony R. Lee, Peter Ti\v{n}o, Iain B. Styles
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 17

Resolution limits for process comparison from event data

The paper examines how event data from hospital processes can obscure whether activities occur concurrently or sequentially. It shows that standard event‑log approaches, based on stochastic language, often fail to distinguish concurrency because any log can be explained by a model with no concurrent events. The authors argue that the key to resolving this ambiguity lies in the choice of what is recorded—such as precise start and end times or object‑centric ordering—rather than simply collecting more data.

arXiv AI
Jun 15

Learning optimal policies from event logs through reinforcement learning: a comparison of deep and MDP-based approaches

arXiv:2303. 09209v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Prescriptive Process Monitoring is an emerging area within Process Mining that focuses on recommending actions to optimize business outcomes.

By Stefano Branchi, Andrei Buliga, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini, Riccardo Graziosi, Francesca Meneghello, Massimiliano Ronzani