arXiv:2607. 01859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety training for large language models (LLMs) is conducted predominantly in English, leaving uncertain how well safety mechanisms generalize to low-resource languages and mixed-language code-switching.
By Joshua Adrian Cahyono
Safety training for large language models (LLMs) is conducted predominantly in English, leaving uncertain how well safety mechanisms generalize to low-resource languages and mixed-language code-switching. We show that this creates an epistemic gap in which models confidently generate harmful responses for inputs that fall outside the distribution of their safety training.
arXiv:2606. 00160v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) suffer from degraded safety capabilities even when fine-tuned with benign datasets.
By Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang, Jie Pan, Jinbiao Zhu
arXiv:2603. 07445v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often require fine-tuning (FT) to perform well on downstream tasks, but FT can induce safety-alignment drift even when the training dataset contains only benign data.
By Guoli Wang, Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An Wang
arXiv:2508.20766v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Safety alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) often involves mediating internal representations to refuse harmful requests. Recent researc...
By Harethah Abu Shairah, Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, George Turkiyyah, Bernard Ghanem
arXiv:2605.14605v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Model providers increasingly release the weights of large language models. Although these models are safety-aligned before release, their saf...
By Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga, Gilad Gressel, Yisroel Mirsky