arXiv Machine Learning
Flow Matching with Uncertainty Quantification and Guidance
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30
Momentum Guidance: Plug-and-Play Guidance for Flow Models
arXiv:2602. 20360v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Flow-based generative methods offer a simple and effective framework for high-fidelity generation, yet pretrained flow models are rarely used in their vanilla conditional form: in image generation, samples without guidance often appear diffuse and lack fine-grained detail.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv:2606. 18043v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
Divergence is Uncertainty: A Closed-Form Posterior Covariance for Flow Matching
arXiv:2605. 00941v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Flow matching has become a leading framework for generative modeling, but quantifying the uncertainty of its samples remains an open problem.
arXiv AI
Sep 2
Training-Free Refinement of Flow Matching with Divergence-based Sampling
The paper introduces Flow Divergence Sampler (FDS), a training‑free method that refines intermediate states in flow‑matching models by using the divergence of the marginal velocity field to detect and correct misguidance toward low‑density regions. FDS operates during inference, requires no additional training, and can be applied as a plug‑and‑play module with standard solvers and existing flow backbones. Experiments show that FDS consistently improves fidelity in tasks such as text‑to‑image synthesis and inverse problems.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 16
Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models
Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets. Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
PathGuide: Dynamic Classifier-Free Guidance via On-Policy Transport Alignment
arXiv:2608.29107v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While modern generative models excel at modeling complex data, precise inference-time control in conditional generation remains a critical challenge. C...