arXiv Machine Learning By Ralf R\"omer, Maximilian Seeliger, Saida Liu, Ben Sturgis, Marco Bagatella, Daniel Marta, Andreas Krause, Angela P. Schoellig

Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 18043v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 16

Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets. Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

FlowDAgger: Human-in-the-Loop Adaptation of Generative Robot Policies in Latent Space

arXiv:2607. 08877v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained generative robot policies based on flow matching and diffusion have achieved impressive results across a wide range of manipulation tasks.

By Michael Murray, Daphne Chen, Simran Bagaria, Dean Fortier, Tess Hellebrekers, Galen Mullins, Harshavardhan Gajarla, Oier Mees, Maya Cakmak, Andrey Kolobov
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models on SO-101: Failure and Recovery Analysis

arXiv:2606. 08881v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong generalization in robotic manipulation, yet existing evaluations are primarily conducted in simulation or on expensive robotic platforms, leaving their robustness on affordable real-world robots largely unexplored.

By Yi Yu, Xinchuan Qiu