arXiv:2602. 02908v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models trained on different, non-overlapping subsets of a dataset often produce strikingly similar outputs when given the same noise seed.
By Binxu Wang, Jacob Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz Pehlevan
arXiv:2606. 27696v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we are the first to examine the correlations between class frequency and the multi-scale noise schedule within diffusion models.
By Jiequan Cui, Beier Zhu, Qingshan Xu, Xiaojuan Qi, Bei Yu, Hanwang Zhang
arXiv:2602. 17706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion models learn data distributions indirectly through denoising, making the difficulty of generative modeling closely tied to the dependency structure of data.
By Rongyao Cai, Yuxi Wan, Kexin Zhang, Ming Jin, Zhiqiang Ge, Qingsong Wen, Yong Liu
arXiv:2606. 02661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate precipitation nowcasting is vital for disaster mitigation, but deep learning methods face a key trade-off: regression models produce over-smoothed, spectrally decaying predictions that blur convective details and violate turbulence power laws; diffusion models generate realistic yet unanchored hallucinations lacking physical grounding.
By Yunlong Zhou, Chen Zhao, Danyang Peng, Fanfan Ji, Xiao-Tong Yuan
arXiv:2603. 14294v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Do video diffusion models encode signals predictive of physical plausibility?
By Chujun Tang, Lei Zhong, Fangqiang Ding
Existing diffusion-based methods have recently made significant progress in image dehazing. However, they typically neglect the physics of haze formation and reconstruct clean images from pure Gaussian noise, thereby limiting their restoration potential.