arXiv:2607. 01297v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most existing audio classification methods suppose that each query (testing) sample belongs to a class of support (training) samples, and misrecognize samples of unseen classes as seen classes (cannot reject samples of unseen classes).
By Yanxiong Li, Jiaxin Tan, Qianqian Li, Guoqing Chen, Sen Huang, Tuomas Virtanen
arXiv:2605. 13075v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Few-shot spoken word classification has largely been developed for applications where a small number of classes is considered, and so the potential of larger-scale few-shot spoken word classification remains untapped.
By Louise Beyers, Batsirayi Mupamhi Ziki, Ruan van der Merwe
arXiv:2606. 31587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio-Language Models (ALMs) achieve strong zero-shot performance by aligning audio with textual class descriptions.
By Asif Hanif, Mohammad Yaqub
arXiv:2605. 13672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-shot classification (FSC) is widely used for learning from limited labeled data, yet most evaluations implicitly assume that target concepts are independent of contextual cues.
By Giries Abu Ayoub, Morad Tukan, Loay Mualem
arXiv:2607. 26607v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-shot Open-set audio classification requires classifying query samples from known classes with a few labeled support samples while rejecting query samples from unknown classes.
By Tianyan Deng, Yanxiong Li, Rui Gao, Jiahao Du
arXiv:2606. 15751v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio-Language Models (ALMs) have shown remarkable success in zero-shot audio classification by aligning audio waveforms with text.
By Hyebin Cho, Jaehyuk Jang, Changick Kim, Joon Son Chung