arXiv:2609. 12259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Matrix-valued memories make rank the natural budget of a learned representation: the number of independent directions a state spans bounds what it can bind, compose, and track.
By Samuel Larson
arXiv:2607. 28685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent-safety benchmarks measure different behaviors, and their scores get quoted interchangeably as an agent's safety.
By Youting Wang, Xiao Han, Dingyan Shang, Yuan Tang, Bowen Liu
arXiv:2601.17454v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Tabular studies are a common way to compare independent and centralized multi-agent learners, because they avoid function approximation. A na...
By Muhammad Ahmed Atif, Nehal Naeem Haji, Muhammad Ebad Atif, Mohammad Shahid Shaikh
arXiv:2606. 14200v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open platforms increasingly route tasks among heterogeneous LLM agents--differing in base model, scaffold, and tool stack--whose competence varies sharply by skill: an agent excellent at one skill may be useless at another.
By Yihan Xia, Taotao Wang
The paper introduces Steiner’s taxonomy of group tasks to study how multi‑agent large language model (LLM) teams scale on disjunctive versus compensatory tasks. By modeling agents as conditionally independent given the item, it shows that plurality voting converges to the modal answer while averaging converges to the item‑level bias. Experiments with 13 open‑weight models and up to 30 agents reveal that disjunctive tasks benefit from larger teams, whereas compensatory tasks like Fermi estimation see little improvement, highlighting that task structure and aggregation method fundamentally determine team scaling.
By Carolina Fortuna, Blaz Bertalanic
arXiv:2608. 16190v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Trusted monitoring has a cheap, trusted model score a stronger untrusted model's actions, and a diverse ensemble of them beats a single stronger monitor at matched cost.
By Anik Jha