arXiv:2606. 28226v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow Matching (FM) has achieved remarkable generative performance, yet it suffers from exposure bias due to discrepancies between training and inference.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 12171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising.
arXiv:2603. 13421v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative models based on the Flow Matching objective, particularly Rectified Flow, have emerged as a dominant paradigm for efficient, high-fidelity image synthesis.
In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising. Although prior work shows that these parameterizations lead to different empirical behaviors, the mechanisms underlying their respective advantages remain to be underexplored, and how to combine them effectively is still unclear.
arXiv:2607. 27656v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped Transformers create a useful train- and test-time compute axis by reusing the same Transformer block over recurrent depth, increasing effective depth at a fixed parameter count.
arXiv:2512. 19311v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper studies the training-testing discrepancy (a.
Pixel-space generative models bypass lossy latent compression, yet necessitate joint learning of global structure and fine-grained details in a high-dimensional space. Standard flow matching interpolates noise toward a fixed clean-image endpoint, leaving the spectral evolution to be learned implicitly.