arXiv AI By Jasmina Gajcin, Juan C. Rosero, Ivana Dusparic

Explaining Reinforcement Learning Decisions in Self-adaptive Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 14620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been extensively used in autonomous and self-* systems, but RL policies, especially deep RL ones relying on neural networks, lack transparency and are difficult to understand.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 30

Class-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Counterfactual Explanation Generation

Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) enhance the interpretability of black-box models by generating alternative instances with adjusted feature values that achieve a contrastive outcome. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising approach for CFE generation, enabling efficient exploration of counterfactual instances while ensuring control over key metrics like validity, sparsity, and proximity.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

Can you see how I learn? Human observers' inferences about Reinforcement Learning agents' learning processes

The paper investigates how human observers interpret the learning processes of reinforcement learning (RL) agents. Using a novel observation-based paradigm, the authors conducted two experiments: an exploratory interview study with nine participants that identified four core themes—Agent Goals, Knowledge, Decision Making, and Learning Mechanisms—and a confirmatory study with 34 participants that applied the paradigm across navigation and manipulation tasks and two RL algorithms. Analyses of 816 responses validated the paradigm’s reliability and refined the thematic framework, showing how these themes evolve over time and interrelate.

By Bernhard Hilpert, Muhan Hou, Kim Baraka, Joost Broekens