The paper introduces a training‑free, inference‑time technique to curb hallucinated transcripts in Whisper by projecting decoder activations away from a low‑rank hallucination subspace derived from non‑speech data. Two variants are tested: an always‑on projection that dramatically lowers hallucination rates on non‑speech benchmarks, and a gated version that applies the projection only when non‑speech is predicted, achieving a smaller but still significant reduction. On LibriSpeech, the gated method slightly increases word error rate but keeps false‑rejection rates low, demonstrating a controllable trade‑off between hallucination suppression and recognition accuracy.
By Maryam Abbasihafshejani, Murtuza Jadliwala
The paper introduces Dynamic Alignment Compensation (DAC), a training‑free inference‑time technique designed to reduce hallucinations in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). DAC monitors cross‑modal representation drift across decoder layers and generation steps, applying lightweight residual compensation through Layer‑wise Semantic Compensation and Sequential Semantic Correction. Experiments on nine multimodal benchmarks across various LVLM backbones demonstrate that DAC consistently lowers hallucination rates while preserving overall performance.
By Kairong Yu, Zixin Zhu, Le Yu, Hongwei Wang
arXiv:2511. 13300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative models have shown remarkable performance in speech enhancement (SE), achieving superior perceptual quality over traditional discriminative approaches.
By Xiaobin Rong, Qinwen Hu, Mansur Yesilbursa, Kamil Wojcicki, Jing Lu
arXiv:2606. 02642v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the success of audio-visual large-language models (LLMs), they can produce plausible but ungrounded outputs, termed hallucination.
By Chenshuang Zhang, Kyeong Seon Kim, Chengxin Liu, Tae-Hyun Oh
arXiv:2504. 10020v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contrastive decoding strategies are widely used to reduce object hallucinations in multimodal large language models (MLLMs).
By Hao Yin, Guangzong Si, Zilei Wang
The paper investigates why automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems sometimes generate fluent text that does not correspond to the input audio, a phenomenon termed hallucination. By examining two independently trained Conformer‑Large models—one using CTC and the other RNN‑T—under conditions of environmental noise and speaker‑background shift, the authors identify the final encoder stage as a critical boundary. Bypassing this final block leads to divergence on almost all utterances, while bypassing earlier blocks has minimal effect; at this stage, representations become compact, the decoder can read the text, and grapheme information becomes explicit, yet the output is garbled or repetitive rather than fluent fabrication. The study thus pinpoints a mechanistic precondition for hallucination—failure to produce adequately grounded output—though it does not fully explain naturally occurring hallucinations, and it highlights a consistent terminal‑stage dependency across decoder families and distribution shifts.
By Hamees Sayed, Apoorv Singh, Kumar Aman, Akshat Mandloi