arXiv AI By Priyank Jayraj, Devanshu sahoo, Uday Mittal

Exact Unlearning After Data Curation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates what a service must retain to faithfully reproduce a training pipeline after data deletion requests, focusing on a rule where earlier similar records block later ones. It shows that a limit on future deletions precisely determines which records can still be needed for training, enabling an exact repair of training statistics after repeated deletions. The authors also construct finite‑precision features for ridge regression and demonstrate that the required private information can be minimized across a sequence of deletion requests, validating their approach on 1,001 AskUbuntu records.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Why Forget-Only Unlearning Needs Memorization

The paper investigates the feasibility of forget‑only unlearning, where a deletion algorithm can only access the trained model and the examples to forget, without any retained data or additional training information. It demonstrates that the possibility of successful unlearning depends on the learning method, showing that different datasets can yield identical models yet require distinct post‑deletion outputs. The authors establish lower bounds on the accuracy of unlearning relative to retraining and prove that, for certain learners, the algorithm must memorize a substantial portion of the training data—potentially the entire dataset—to handle arbitrary deletion requests, implying that models designed for forget‑only unlearning may need to retain more information than standard training does.

By Luka Radi\'c, Vikrant Singhal, Amartya Sanyal
arXiv AI
Jun 3

PURGE: Projected Unlearning via Retain-Guided Erasure

arXiv:2606. 03808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose PURGE, a machine unlearning algorithm built on a simple but an under-exploited observation: continual learning (CL) and machine unlearning (MU) which are fundamentally dual problems.

By Vedant Jawandhia, Daksh Ahuja, Ghufran Alam Siddiqui, Prashant Trivedi, Yash Sinha, Pratik Narang
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

From Mathematical to Executable Certificates for Machine Unlearning

The paper introduces Executable Release Certification (ExecCert), a layer that certifies machine‑unlearning artifacts at release time. ExecCert either closes a method’s native certificate for the executed candidate or applies Retraining‑Reference Release Verification (RRV) to ensure fidelity to the current retain‑set. An incremental RRV is developed for frozen representations with a mutable ridge head, allowing certified evidence to be maintained across deletion requests without full reconstruction. Experiments on four unlearning implementations show ExecCert preserves valid certificates, tightens bounds, and improves release decisions, while incremental certification remains cost‑effective in sequential‑service settings.

By Ziyu Zhao, Xinyu Wang, Xiaowen Chang, Yixuan He
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

Exact Unlearning via Quantized Sufficient Statistics

The paper introduces Quantized Sufficient Statistics (QSS), a method that separates a frozen global schema from mutable, sum‑decomposable content to enable exact unlearning. QSS offers two variants: QSS‑L, which removes a label while keeping the input, and QSS‑E, which removes both input and label by learning a schema without deletable examples. Experiments on 15 vision, text, and tabular datasets show that QSS‑L achieves deletion latencies up to 483× faster than SISA while maintaining comparable accuracy, and QSS‑E quantifies the accuracy trade‑off when all traces of an input are removed.

By Ami Tavory, Shripad Gade, Tal Sarig, Noam Touitou, Ido Guy