arXiv:2606. 29082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Would experience designing faster GPU kernels also help close in on a long-standing open mathematical conjecture?
By Young-Jun Lee, Seungone Kim, Minki Kang, Alistair Cheong Liang Chuen, Zerui Chen, Seungho Han, Taehee Jung, Dongyeop Kang
arXiv:2608. 10795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains.
By Viktor Volkov, Valentin Khrulkov, Andrey V. Galichin, Danil Sivtsov, Nikita Glazkov, Olga Volkova, Konstantin Pchelin, Iaroslav Bespalov, Dmitry V. Dylov, Petr Anokhin, Ivan Oseledets
Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains. However, existing LLM-driven evolutionary frameworks largely discard such knowledge, repeatedly rediscovering similar ideas and limiting opportunities for cross-run and cross-task learning.
FrugalEvo introduces a cost‑aware evolutionary framework that pairs a high‑cost, powerful LLM with a cheaper LLM to explore and refine program solutions, respectively. It incorporates a cache‑efficient evolution process that maximizes prefix reuse across steps and defines a Budget‑Aware Area Under the Curve (BA‑AUC) metric to evaluate solution quality within a fixed cost budget. Across ten mathematical and systems optimization tasks, FrugalEvo matches or surpasses state‑of‑the‑art baselines in final solution quality and achieves higher BA‑AUC on nine tasks, while delivering new state‑of‑the‑art performance on circle packing for costs as low as $0.55 to $1.68.
By Hui Chen, Xuan Qi, James Xu Zhao, Zhaopeng Feng, Shilong Liu, Kuang Xu, Pang Wei Koh, Bryan Hooi
TurboEvolve is a multi‑island evolutionary framework that enhances LLM‑driven program evolution by improving sample efficiency and stability within fixed API‑cost budgets. It introduces Verbalized Sampling to generate multiple diverse candidates in a single LLM call, an adaptive scheduler that adjusts the number of offspring based on progress, and island‑aware initialization that clusters seed programs and mixes subpopulations with elitist preservation. The authors also provide a reusable cross‑task solution‑pool dataset and demonstrate that TurboEvolve achieves better cost‑quality trade‑offs and more stable performance on mathematical discovery and GPU‑kernel optimization tasks compared to controlled baselines.
By Yang Yang, Zining Zhong, Jindong Li, Jiemin Wu, Kaishen Yuan, Wenshuo Chen, Menglin Yang, Yutao Yue
arXiv:2609.38639v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-guided evolutionary search can discover complex programs, but existing methods mostly only save candidate programs and fitness scores while discard...
By Ethan Lin, Jinming Nian, Yi Fang