arXiv AI By Kushal Raj Bhandari, Ling Yue, Ching-Yun Ko, Dhaval Patel, Shaowu Pan, Pin-Yu Chen, Jianxi Gao

Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 12674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Compact language models (LMs) reduce cost, latency, and deployment risk for tool agents.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

ToolLIFT: Lifting Tool-Specific Trajectories into Function-Level Graphs for Generalizable Tool Planning

Historical tool-use trajectories provide valuable experience for large language model (LLM) agents to plan and coordinate tool usage. Existing approaches directly construct tool-level graphs from these trajectories, but the resulting graphs remain tied to specific tools and are hard to generalize across tool sets.

arXiv AI
Jul 21

DataFlow-Harness: A Grounded Code-Agent Platform for Constructing Editable LLM Data Pipelines

arXiv:2607. 16617v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate data-processing workflows, yet coding agents typically produce scripts that are not automatically materialized as persistent, editable platform artifacts.

By Runming He, Zhen Hao Wong, Hao Liang, Zimo Meng, Chengyu Shen, Xiaochen Ma, Wentao Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Complete Cyclic Subtask Graphs for Tool-Using LLM Agents: Flexibility, Cost, and Bottlenecks in Long-Horizon Workflows

The paper introduces complete cyclic subtask graphs for large language model agents, enabling a workflow controller where all subtasks are fully connected and a unified agent selects transitions based on natural‑language criteria. It evaluates task‑specific and benchmark‑generic cyclic graphs on TextCraft, ALFWorld, and Finance‑Agent, comparing them to ReAct and dependency‑directed workflows, and identifies three distinct workflow signatures that influence the effectiveness of cyclic routing. The study also provides a workflow‑signature matrix, robustness analysis, token‑cost accounting, and failure‑mode structure, concluding that cyclic subtask graphs serve as a diagnostic tool to determine when flexible backtracking is worthwhile versus when simpler controllers suffice.

By Luay Gharzeddine, Samer Saab Jr