Historical tool-use trajectories provide valuable experience for large language model (LLM) agents to plan and coordinate tool usage. Existing approaches directly construct tool-level graphs from these trajectories, but the resulting graphs remain tied to specific tools and are hard to generalize across tool sets.
arXiv:2608. 02650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external tools to complete complex real-world tasks.
By Zian Zhai, Xingyu Tan, Gaowang Zou, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenjie Zhang
arXiv:2606. 12674v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Compact language models (LMs) reduce cost, latency, and deployment risk for tool agents.
By Kushal Raj Bhandari, Ling Yue, Ching-Yun Ko, Dhaval Patel, Shaowu Pan, Pin-Yu Chen, Jianxi Gao
arXiv:2608. 10039v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic workflows have become an important abstraction for building reliable LLM-based automation systems by organizing large language models (LLMs), tools, and control logic into explicit execution structures.
By Shuo Hao, You Lu, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng
UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.
By Yijuan Liang, Xinghao Chen, Yifan Ge, Ziyi Wu, Hao Wu, Changyu Zeng, Wei Xing, Xiaoyu Shen
The paper introduces Tool Primitives, a design that replaces rigid API schemas with natural language interfaces for tool calling, enabling seamless inter-tool communication. It builds ToolFace, a repository of over 25,000 functions that LLMs can dynamically retrieve, and HEART, a harness engineering framework that orchestrates tool use with planning, routing, and verification. Experiments show HEART outperforms fine‑tuned models and leading commercial LLMs while cutting API costs by up to 85%.
By Haibo Jin, Suijin Wang, Xucheng Yu, Haojing Luo, Haohan Wang
arXiv:2607. 25718v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on invoking external tools to complete real-world tasks.
By Xinyi Hong, Pinjun Dong, Xinyang Yu, Binyan Jiang
arXiv:2607. 01647v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data science aims to derive actionable insights from heterogeneous raw data, unlocking the value of the massive amounts of data generated in modern society.
By Zhaoyan Sun, Shan Zhong, Daizhou Wen, Jiaxing Han, Guoliang Li, Ying Yan, Peng Zhang, Yu Su, Xiang Qi, Baolin Sun, Chengyuan Yang, Tao Fang, Huaiyu Ruan
arXiv:2606. 05728v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating executable tool plans requires selecting appropriate subsets from tool libraries, a combinatorial search problem with an exponentially large solution space.
By Yansi Li, Zhuosheng Zhang
ToolCUA is an end‑to‑end agent that learns to optimally orchestrate GUI actions and tool calls for Computer Use Agents. It introduces a staged training pipeline that first scales interleaved GUI‑tool trajectories from static GUI data, then bootstraps decision making with single‑turn reinforcement learning, and finally refines performance via online agentic RL guided by a tool‑efficient path reward. On the OSWorld‑MCP benchmark, ToolCUA achieves 46.85% accuracy, a 66% relative improvement over the baseline and a 3.9% gain over GUI‑only models, setting a new state of the art for comparable‑scale models.
By Xuhao Hu, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu, Kyle Qiao, Jingyi Yang, Xuanjing Huang, Jing Shao, Ming Yan, Jieping Ye
The paper introduces complete cyclic subtask graphs for large language model agents, enabling a workflow controller where all subtasks are fully connected and a unified agent selects transitions based on natural‑language criteria. It evaluates task‑specific and benchmark‑generic cyclic graphs on TextCraft, ALFWorld, and Finance‑Agent, comparing them to ReAct and dependency‑directed workflows, and identifies three distinct workflow signatures that influence the effectiveness of cyclic routing. The study also provides a workflow‑signature matrix, robustness analysis, token‑cost accounting, and failure‑mode structure, concluding that cyclic subtask graphs serve as a diagnostic tool to determine when flexible backtracking is worthwhile versus when simpler controllers suffice.
By Luay Gharzeddine, Samer Saab Jr
arXiv:2606. 04494v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biomedical agents promise to automate complex biological workflows, yet current systems face two fundamental bottlenecks: bioinformatics tools are highly heterogeneous in interfaces and execution environments, while agent planning still relies on flat prompt-retrieved tool descriptions.
By Zhangtianyi Chen, Florensia Widjaja, Wufei Dai, Xiangjun Zhang, Yuhao Shen, Juexiao Zhou