arXiv AI
Evaluating Visual Language Models on Visual Grounding for Visually Impaired People
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 27
PixFoundation: Are We Heading in the Right Direction with Pixel-level Vision Foundation Models?
arXiv:2502.04192v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multiple works have emerged to push the boundaries of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) towards pixel-level understanding. The current tren...
arXiv AI
Aug 26
When Seeing Is Not Enough: Benchmarking Interactive Visual Grounding in LVLMs
The paper introduces a controlled evaluation framework for interactive visual grounding in large vision-language models (LVLMs), examining how varying amounts of initial target information and dialogue affect performance. Experiments across four visual contexts and interaction protocols show that current LVLMs lag behind human baselines, especially when no initial description is given and information must be gathered through questions. The study also finds that LVLMs are poorly calibrated, often overestimating confidence, and that interactive grounding remains a significant challenge requiring visual matching, information seeking, and synthesis.
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16
MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning
MagiC is a benchmark for grounded multimodal cognition that evaluates vision‑language models on answer accuracy, step‑by‑step reasoning quality, grounding fidelity, and self‑correction. It contains about 5,500 weakly supervised QA examples generated from strong model outputs and 900 human‑curated examples with fine‑grained annotations, including rationales and bounding box groundings. The benchmark tests 15 models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters, introduces new metrics such as MagiScore and StepSense, and includes diagnostic settings to probe robustness against adversarial visual cues and introspective error correction.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 29
From Accuracy to Visual Dependence: Auditing and Filtering Modality Collapse in Traffic VideoQA
High benchmark accuracy does not guarantee genuine use of visual evidence. We study this problem in traffic accident Video Question Answering (VideoQA), where correct answers should depend on scene-specific visual evidence but may instead be inferred from textual shortcuts.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
ReVA: A Region-Aware Visual Assistant for Visually Grounded Question Answering
arXiv:2608.28707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they continue to struggle with quest...
arXiv AI
Jul 10
AUTOPILOT VQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Incident-Centric Dashcam Understanding
arXiv:2607. 08745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Vision-Language Models, Large Language Models, and Multimodal Large Language Models have improved autonomous driving tasks such as scene understanding, decision making, trajectory prediction, and visual question answering.