arXiv:2509. 21945v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: To efficiently tune configuration for better software system performance (e.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 16476v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Software configuration tuning is crucial for optimising system performance, and various optimisers have emerged over the last decade.
arXiv:2607. 10420v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In software analytics, rerunning the same analysis twice often yields different models and conclusions.
arXiv:2606. 17660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is compute-intensive and error-prone: model performance depends sensitively on data quality and hyperparameter choices, and na\"ive runs can even degrade model performance.
arXiv:2606. 20512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based coding agents need higher-level operational knowledge about a repository (which files house which subsystems, how to run the test suite, which workflows have historically led to wrong fixes) that does not exist in the code itself.
Atlas is a framework that optimizes the deployment of compound AI workflows on heterogeneous clusters by selecting execution plans that satisfy service level objectives (SLOs). It introduces MAP, a Markovian Accuracy Predictor, which estimates configuration accuracy using local conditional accuracy transitions between adjacent workflow stages, avoiding exhaustive end‑to‑end profiling. Atlas formulates plan selection as a mixed‑integer linear program, achieving near‑oracle accuracy while reducing deployment cost by up to 42% and profiling cost by up to 2.6×.
RankEvolve is an auto‑research framework that evolves generative ranking models by orchestrating multiple large‑language‑model coding agents through an Executable Operating Protocol (EOP). The system compiles a state machine that enforces phases, gates, branches, and loops, while a meta‑meta‑harness lets agents review and repair each other’s code. In budget‑matched experiments, heterogeneous composition of agents raised execution accuracy from 45.8 % to 62.5 % and reduced silent critical‑defect rates, achieving notable gains on the HSTU recommender and other benchmarks.