Evaluating Tibetan Speech Recognition Across Dialects and Adaptation Regimes: A Multi-Granularity Analysis
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 17164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Developing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for morphologically rich, low-resource languages such as Assamese is challenging due to insufficient annotated speech data.
arXiv:2609.09554v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce BuzzASR, a collection of language-specialized fine-tuned Whisper models adapted for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in 102 languages. L...
arXiv:2608. 12327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual pretrained models nominally support Nepali, yet no controlled benchmark has compared them under a single fine-tuning protocol.
The paper examines how different data‑augmentation techniques affect low‑resource automatic speech recognition beyond overall error rates. It compares speed perturbation, SpecAugment, and two text‑based audio synthesis methods across four low‑resource languages and English, analyzing phoneme‑level errors. The study finds that SpecAugment improves aggregate performance but increases tone and palatalization errors, while text‑based methods introduce consonant insertions; when combined, each method mitigates the other's weaknesses, yielding superadditive gains that diminish as data size grows to 100 hours.
The paper investigates how to close the quality gap in low‑resource text‑to‑speech for Khmer and Korean using the VoxCPM2 model. By training a single low‑rank adaptation (LoRA) adapter on a shared 25.5‑hour corpus, the authors improve Khmer’s mean opinion score from 3.85 to 4.23 with a rank‑64 adapter, while Korean shows no significant gain. The study highlights that adaptation benefits mainly when the base model is weak and that training loss does not always align with human ratings.
arXiv:2605. 20712v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automatic speech recognition replaces typing only when correction costs less than manual entry - a threshold determined by error types, not counts: fixing a misrecognized domain term costs far more than inserting a comma.