Hugging Face Trending Papers

Evaluating Regional Bias in LLMs From Abstract Stereotype to Concrete Social Decision-Making

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Regional bias in large language models (LLMs) may shape both perceptions of regional groups and decisions about individuals from different regions. Yet existing studies often examine these manifestations separately, leaving their structure and consequences unclear.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

Cultural (In)Competence: Investigating Culture-Specific Stereotype Detection Capabilities of LLMs

arXiv:2610.22545v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Stereotypes are subjective constructs that are mediated by the cultural context in which they are viewed. Successfully modeling them thus also requires...

By Maximilian Splieth\"over, Jannes L\"otfering, Dominik Bachmann, Alexander Espig, Willem Zuidema, Katrin Schulz, Henning Wachsmuth
arXiv AI
Oct 5

CuBEs: Culturally-Situated Behavioral Evaluations and the Limitations of Culture-Blind LLM Judges

CuBEs introduces culturally‑situated behavioral evaluations for large language models, adding cultural context to test scenarios and assessments. The authors built a human‑labeled dataset covering 12 cultures, revealing significant cross‑cultural differences that one‑size‑fits‑all judgments miss. Evaluating 13 LLMs shows that culturally situated tests uncover varied behaviors, such as Western political bias versus non‑Western religious or colonial biases, which standard evaluations overlook.

By Hoda Ayad, Tanu Mitra, Abhishek Mukherji
arXiv Computation and Language
Nov 4

From Language to Country to Valence: A Multilingual Audit of Stereotype Bias Across LLMs

The paper presents a multilingual audit of stereotype bias in large language models (LLMs) using 12,000 locally written Reddit posts in English, Spanish, French, and German. It evaluates gender, racial, and religious bias across six models (three open-weight and three proprietary APIs) with a two-blank design to reduce grammatical cues, finding that religion shows the highest imbalance, Spanish leads in gender bias, and German in race and religion. The study highlights that aggregate scores can mask category- and context-specific biases, underscoring the need for detailed inspection before deploying LLMs in consequential settings.

By Zihao Sun