arXiv Machine Learning By Yu Zhang, Bokui Wan, Yongli Qin, Jinyong Ma, Yifan Guo

Ensuring Trustworthy Online A/B Testing: Addressing Five Key Questions on CUPED

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 18750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A/B testing has become the gold standard for data-driven decision-making in large-scale online experimentation, providing critical guidance for feature launch, pricing optimization, and user experience enhancement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Offline Policy Evaluation as a decision support tool for designing Adaptive Experiments

The paper explores how data from fixed A/B tests can guide the deployment of adaptive experiments using contextual bandits. By combining off‑policy evaluation with a controlled warm‑start simulation, the authors rank pre‑specified adaptive and non‑adaptive policies using doubly robust estimators. Experiments on synthetic trials and real benchmarks show that adaptive, context‑aware policies outperform fixed allocations when heterogeneity exists, but offer little advantage otherwise.

By Jo\~ao Victor Ferreira Alves, Eduardo Rocha Laurentino, Gustavo de Oliveira Kanno, Thiago Costa Rizuti da Rocha
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validation

arXiv:2506. 03062v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A/B tests in online experiments face statistical power challenges when testing multiple candidates simultaneously, while adaptive experimental designs (AED) alone fall short in inferring experiment statistics such as the average treatment effect, especially with many metrics (e.

By Qining Zhang, Tanner Fiez, Yi Liu, Wenyang Liu