arXiv Machine Learning
Evaluating Inference Compute for Generative AI: A Framework for Enterprise Workloads
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11
Optimizing AI Inference Across the Deployment Stack
The paper argues that AI deployment performance depends on interactions among compression, compiler transformations, and serving policies rather than just model architecture. It introduces a three‑layer taxonomy—model‑level techniques, compiler transformations, and system policies—and frames deployment as a constrained multi‑objective optimization problem over accuracy, latency, throughput, memory footprint, and energy. The authors propose an evidence protocol for comparable benchmarking and synthesize data from edge and data‑center platforms to show that cross‑layer interactions drive deployment outcomes, concluding with a constraint‑aware selection procedure and open research problems.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 28
AgentPerfBench: A Benchmarking and Evaluation Suite for Inference Performance of Agentic LLMs
AgentPerfBench is a new benchmarking suite designed to evaluate the inference performance of agentic large language models (LLMs) that handle multi‑turn, tool‑using, and context‑expanding tasks. It builds on real traces from agentic benchmarks such as SWE‑Bench and TerminalBench, and generates synthetic profiles that reflect realistic input/output lengths and turn counts. The suite also provides kernel‑level Nsight Compute traces and a multi‑dimensional roofline model to identify hardware bottlenecks and quantify the gap between traditional chat benchmarks and agentic workloads.
arXiv AI
Sep 2
UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities
UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.
arXiv AI
Jun 16
Frontier: Towards Comprehensive and Accurate LLM Inference Simulation
arXiv:2605. 21312v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern LLM serving is no longer homogeneous or monolithic.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
From LLM Inference to Agentic Workloads: Characterization and Implications for Serving Systems
arXiv:2608. 15127v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic applications are shifting AI serving from isolated model inference to long-running workloads in which LLMs coordinate tools, environments, and persistent state.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 10
Cascade: Exploiting SLO-Aware latency budget for fair and high goodput LLM inference serving
arXiv:2608. 06557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The reasoning and agentic capabilities of large language models have expanded the range of applications they support, from short interactive exchanges to long, compute-heavy requests.