arXiv:2604.13287v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Weight pruning is a common technique for compressing large neural networks. We focus on the challenging post-training one-shot setting, where a pre...
By Gabriel Afriat, Xiang Meng, Shibal Ibrahim, Hussein Hazimeh, Rahul Mazumder
arXiv:2407.03463v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: In the realm of self-supervised learning (SSL), conventional wisdom has gravitated towards the utility of massive, general domain datasets fo...
By Jes\'us M Rodr\'iguez-de-Vera, Imanol G Estepa, Ignacio Saras\'ua, Bhalaji Nagarajan, Petia Radeva
arXiv:2605. 30188v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable probability estimates are critical in many machine learning applications, yet modern classifiers are often poorly calibrated.
By Eug\`ene Berta, David Holzm\"uller, Francis Bach, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv:2603. 15106v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Enabling efficient deep neural network (DNN) inference on edge devices with different hardware constraints is a challenging task that typically requires DNN architectures to be specialized for each device separately.
By Mark Deutel, Simon Geis, Axel Plinge
The paper introduces a method for efficiently exploring the Rashomon set of Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) by using a parallel parameter‑efficient adaptation module, checkpointing, and a concept diversity objective. This approach generates multiple equally accurate CBMs from a single training process, achieving greater diversity than baseline methods while consuming less memory. The resulting diverse models enable trustworthy selection, reduce inter‑class confusion, and support reliable abstention in decision‑making.
By Shihan Feng, Cheng Zhang, Michael Xi, Ethan Hsu, Lesia Semenova, Chudi Zhong
The paper evaluates out‑of‑the‑box object detection models for automatic target detection and recognition (ATD/R) in military settings. Six YOLO variants and two DETR variants were benchmarked on a new military dataset featuring vehicles, occlusions, and small targets, with performance measured in mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 across air‑to‑ground and ground‑to‑ground perspectives. Findings show larger models and DETR-based approaches perform best, fine‑tuning on the VisDrone dataset improves air‑to‑ground and small‑object performance, yet all models still struggle with small targets in air‑to‑ground scenarios.
By Alma M. Liezenga, Lotte Nijskens, Henrik R. Baumann, Stefan Becker, Simon Bensberg, Niccol\`o Camarlinghi, H{\aa}vard R. Eiring, Alexander W. Johnsgaard, Tanel Liiv, Giuseppe Martino, Matteo Marturini, Matthias Rapp, Jan Erik van Woerden, Alexander Wolpert, Hugo J. Kuijf