arXiv Machine Learning By Jonas Schweisthal, Yuxin Wang, Athiya Deviyani, Stefan Feuerriegel, Dennis Frauen

Efficient Best-of-N policy evaluation for inference-time alignment

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a sample‑only framework for evaluating and selecting Best‑of‑N (BoN) inference‑time alignment policies without needing response likelihoods. By exploiting the order‑statistic structure of BoN, the authors express required density ratios through score‑rank probabilities that can be estimated from samples alone, and develop a doubly robust estimator (BoN‑DR) that reuses a shared auxiliary sample pool across candidate budgets. The method provides valid asymptotic inference even with reward estimator misspecification, proves efficiency, and offers two selection rules—maximizing estimated policy value or a lower confidence bound—to avoid over‑optimization and guarantee no harm, as demonstrated on synthetic data and GSM8K.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

Adaptive Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behavior

The paper introduces Adaptive Doubly Robust (ADR), an off‑policy evaluation method for ranking policies that blends adaptive importance weighting with reward regression to reduce variance. ADR is unbiased when the true user behavior model is known and, under a sufficient condition, achieves lower variance than the prior Adaptive Inverse Propensity Scoring (AIPS) approach. Experiments on synthetic data show that ADR consistently improves mean squared error over AIPS and other ranking OPE estimators across various data sizes and ranking lengths.

By Kosuke Iguchi, Ren Kishimoto