arXiv AI
Sep 3

PhoenixNest-Video: Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Agent Framework for Automated Video Interview Assessment

PhoenixNest-Video is an evidence‑grounded multimodal agent designed for automated video interview assessment. It constructs a semantic video graph as working memory, retrieves information conditioned on rubrics across visual, audio, and textual streams, and outputs per‑criterion scores tied to the candidate’s materials. Trained with rubric‑based reinforcement learning, the system achieves 91.50% grade‑level accuracy on VInterview‑2025, outperforming larger proprietary models while providing traceable evidence for each score.

By Fan Yuxuan, Huang Miaojun, Zhang Haimei, Wu Jingshen, Liu Hao
arXiv AI
Jun 12

Frozen Multimodal Embeddings for AI-Assisted Interview Assessment of Personality and Cognitive Ability

arXiv:2606. 11930v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging problem in AI-assisted interview assessment because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.

By Kuo-En Hung, Hung-Yue Suen, Shih-Ching Yeh, Hsiang-Wen Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 11

Frozen Multimodal Embeddings for Personality and Cognitive Ability Assessment in Asynchronous Video Interviews

arXiv:2606. 11930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging multimodal learning problem because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.

By Kuo-En Hung, Hung-Yue Suen, Shih-Ching Yeh, Hsiang-Wen Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports

EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.

By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen