arXiv Machine Learning By Ao Zhou, Zhiwei Jiang, Zifeng Cheng, Cong Wang, Shufan Yang, Haoru Chen, Qing Gu

Dynamic Distribution-Aware Uncertainty Tracking in Vision-Language Representation Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 09011v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) aims to measure the reliability of model predictions, serving as a critical safeguard for deploying Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in safety-critical scenarios.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 10

SeFaR: Semantic Feature-aware Robustness Testing of Deep Neural Networks

Deep neural networks are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains as perception modules, where failures are often caused due to rare and under-represented scenarios. This necessitates the need to evaluate the semantic robustness of perception models; conformance of behavior to high-level requirements over real-world perceptual variability.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 16

Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets. Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

FailSAE: Towards Interpretable Failure Prediction for Vision-Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders

The paper introduces FailSAE, a method that uses Sparse Autoencoders to predict failures in vision‑language models (VLMs) such as CLIP. By treating failure prediction as a classification over sparse SAE latent activations and employing a three‑stage training pipeline, the approach yields higher prediction accuracy than existing confidence‑score or auxiliary‑classifier baselines. Analysis shows that the SAE captures class‑specific concepts and reveals a shift toward ambiguous or style‑related concepts during failures, offering insights for runtime failure recovery.

By Jie Ma, Zongxi Liu, Yi Zhu