The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2608.29711v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While MLLMs have made significant strides in chart comprehension and video understanding, current evaluations largely isolate these capabilities, leavi...
arXiv:2604. 25220v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Data videos combine animated visualizations with synchronized narration to communicate quantitative information and are widely used in journalism, education, and public communication.
arXiv:2604.17422v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long video understanding remains a formidable challenge for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) due to the prohibitive cost of processing dens...
arXiv:2605. 00873v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of photorealistic Text-to-Video (T2V) generation brings in an urgent need for up-to-date evaluation methods.
The paper introduces Short‑Films 20K (SF20K), a large publicly available movie dataset comprising 20,143 amateur films totaling 3,582 hours, with an average length of 12 minutes per film. Accompanying the dataset is SF20K‑Test, a manual open‑ended question‑answering benchmark featuring 95 movies and 979 question‑answer pairs. Analysis of the benchmark shows limited data leakage, highlights the necessity of long‑term reasoning, and demonstrates that instruction tuning on the large‑scale dataset significantly boosts vision‑language model performance.
TimeBlind is a diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate fine‑grained spatio‑temporal compositionality in video large language models (LLMs). It categorizes temporal understanding into three levels—atomic event recognition, event property characterization, and reasoning about event interdependencies—and uses a minimal‑pairs paradigm where video pairs share identical static content but differ only in temporal structure. Across 20 state‑of‑the‑art MLLMs tested on 600 curated instances, the best model achieved only 48.2% instance accuracy, far below human performance of 98.2%, highlighting a reliance on static visual shortcuts rather than true temporal reasoning.