← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Zechun Niu, Yukun Zhao, Jiaxin Zhang, Xu Shen, Jinhua Si, Han Tian, Can Xu, Yunfan Song, Jiaxin Mao, Yansong Gao, Yuchen Li, Jianmin Wu, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin

DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows

Read the original on arXiv AI →

DuMateBench is a new benchmark for autonomous agents that uses real user sessions from a large production platform, preserving interaction history, configurations, and workspace state. It contains 200 tasks across 8 scenarios and 17 capability categories, many requiring coordination of multiple capabilities. The benchmark tests agents in Docker containers with real-world complexities—Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy—and evaluates performance with a hybrid deterministic and LLM-as-Judge protocol, revealing significant gaps in task completion across various agent frameworks and LLMs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Jun 29

LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks

arXiv:2604. 13072v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: OpenClaw-style personal assistants extend LLM agents from isolated tool use to open-ended, stateful, and personalized software environments.

By Xiang Long, Li Du, Yilong Xu, RongJian Xu, Qiyanhui Lu, Ying Gao, Qinhua Xie, Fangcheng Liu, Ning Ding, Haoqing Wang, Ziheng Li, Changjiang Zhou, Jianyuan Guo, Yehui Tang
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

RealClawBench: Live OpenClaw Benchmarks from Real Developer-Agent Sessions

RealClawBench is a live benchmark framework derived from real OpenClaw developer‑agent sessions, designed to capture the distribution, diversity, and real‑world difficulty of deployed agent use. It reconstructs execution environments and uses deterministic verifiable scorers to convert real sessions into reproducible, automatically scored tasks, yielding 281 executable tasks with minimal distribution shift. Evaluation of 14 contemporary models shows the best system solves only 65.8% of tasks, highlighting significant room for improvement on realistic workloads.

By Zongwei Lv, Yaoming Li, Zhewen Tan, Yilun Yao, Yuxuan Tian, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Weihong Lin, Tong Yang, Guangxiang Zhao
agentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jul 14

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?

arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.

By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →