Drift Calibration in Geometric Eye Tracking Systems
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2610.07783v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bird's-eye-view (BEV) representations have become a widely used interface between perception and planning in autonomous driving, but they encode what i...
arXiv:2502.10570v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mobile gaze tracking on handheld devices commonly relies on \emph{appearance-based 2D gaze estimation} from the device's \emph{front-facing R...
GazeFS is a model that predicts and stabilizes target‑centered gaze trajectories using a variable‑length gaze‑head history, without requiring target information during inference. It maps this history to the next target‑center direction and a short‑horizon Search/Focus estimate, improving focus target centering and reducing residual gaze error. Across 7,960 acquisition episodes from 30 participants, GazeFS reduces Focus episode bias, dispersion, and P90 target error by 0.182°, 0.257°, and 0.400°, respectively, while maintaining high phase‑balanced accuracy and AUPRC.
arXiv:2610.00922v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gaze estimation under natural head-eye motion underpins applications from driver monitoring to human-computer interaction. Single-frame methods predict...
arXiv:2602. 14834v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human eye movements in visual recognition reflect a balance between foveal sampling and peripheral context.
GazeDiT is a diffusion model that generates synthetic eye images conditioned on a precise 4‑dimensional gaze vector by using a spatial condition derived from pupil and iris geometry. During training, a frozen SegFormer extracts this geometry from real images, while inference employs a physical eye renderer to produce gaze‑consistent geometries without needing a source image. The model achieves lower tail gaze‑label error than other diffusion baselines and improves downstream eye‑tracking accuracy, reducing error on challenging cases from 3.05° to 2.80°.