arXiv Computation and Language By Victor Mazzotti, Luiz Pereira, Marina Bitencourt dos Santos, Helena Maia, Carlos Caetano, N\'adia Felix, Sandra Avila

Does Linguistic Structure Enrichment Enhance Coherence Assessment? Not With Current Architectures

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper examines whether adding syntactic and rhetorical structure to text can improve the prediction of incoherence in large language model outputs. Experiments show that plain text actually yields higher accuracy, as the added structural information conflicts with the models’ architectures. The authors also demonstrate that coherence assessment can help detect misleading content by applying zero‑shot experiments to a Brazilian disinformation dataset.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14

When Context Misleads: Surprisal, Energy and Attention Entropy as Metrics of Coherence Illusions in LLMs

The study examines whether Dutch language models exhibit coherence‑illusion effects similar to human readers, using texts that refer back to earlier context with words like ‘again’ and ‘too’. Surprisal at the critical word aligns with human acceptability and eye‑tracking data, showing that models are more surprised by incoherent continuations unless a matching distractor is present. Attention entropy and an energy metric from associative‑memory literature reveal heads that behave differently under coherence versus incoherence, and ablating these heads demonstrates transfer effects across experiments, indicating a shared underlying mechanism.

By Ece Takmaz, Nitin Kumar, Li Kloostra, Jakub Dotlacil
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Diverging Transformer Predictions for Human Sentence Processing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Agreement Attraction Effects

The study evaluates eleven autoregressive transformer models on English agreement attraction scenarios using a surprisal-based approach. Results show that while transformers match human reading times for prepositional phrase configurations, they perform poorly on object‑extracted relative clauses, with predictions diverging across models and failing to capture human interference patterns. The authors argue that current transformers cannot adequately model human morphosyntactic processing and call for more rigorous, comprehensive testing to avoid misleading conclusions from limited syntactic setups.

By Titus von der Malsburg, Sebastian Pad\'o
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

Modelling Adjectival Modification Effects on Semantic Plausibility

The paper investigates how adjectival modifiers affect the semantic plausibility of events, using the Adept benchmark of 16,000 English sentence pairs that differ by a single adjective. Experiments show that sentence transformers, despite being conceptually suited to the task, underperform compared to models like RoBERTa. The authors provide an error analysis and discuss the implications of their findings for future work on balancing training and test data.

By Anna Golub, Beate Zywietz, Annerose Eichel
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

Measuring AI "Slop" in Text

The paper introduces a taxonomy for the term "AI slop," a label for low‑quality AI‑generated text, and proposes interpretable dimensions to assess it. Using expert interviews and span‑level annotation, the authors find that binary slop judgments are somewhat subjective yet correlate with latent factors like coherence and relevance. Their framework can be applied to both detection and preference tasks, offering insights into linguistic and stylistic contributors to quality, while noting that fully automated, scalable methods remain an open challenge.

By Chantal Shaib, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Diego Garcia-Olano, Byron C. Wallace