arXiv Computation and Language By Chand Sahil Mansuri, Joel Zachariah, Sadamori Kojaku

Doc2LoRA Provides Decodable Representations of Scientific Ideas

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

Doc2LoRA introduces a method to represent scientific papers as LoRA adapters generated by a hypernetwork, enabling each point in the resulting vector space—whether a real paper or a mixture—to be interpreted by a large language model (LLM). The approach allows both search and generation: it achieves competitive search performance with models like SPECTER2 and EmbeddingGemma, while also enabling the LLM to label subfields and generate abstracts that smoothly transition between papers. The invertible transform ensures every point maps back to an LLM, making the embeddings usable for both querying and creative idea generation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Generalization through Lexical Abstraction in Transformer Models: The Case of Functional Words

The study investigates whether pretrained transformer models encode functional words—such as pronouns and adverbs—in a way that mirrors human usage. By comparing embeddings of nouns with those of their functional counterparts in both isolated and parallel sentences, the authors find that functional words occupy a central yet distinct position in embedding space and that parallel lexicalized and functional sentences reside in different subspaces. Experiments show that only a mixed training set of functional and lexicalized sentences reveals shared syntactic and semantic structure, whereas training on either type alone fails to capture this parallelism.

By Giuseppe Samo, Vivi Nastase, Paola Merlo
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

RATIO: A Benchmark for Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations in Scientific Literature

RATIO (Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations) is a large-scale benchmark designed to evaluate how well retrieval systems can support scientific inspiration. It defines relevance through three ideation moves—Address, Broaden, and Specify—each targeting different levels of abstraction in literature retrieval. The benchmark is built from millions of full-text CS papers using a novel discourse-marker distant supervision method, and includes extensive LLM and human vetting to ensure quality.

By Maayan Sharon, Tom Hope
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Value Over Language Model: Detecting Original Contribution in Writing

The paper introduces VOLM, a framework that quantifies how much original value a human adds to a document beyond what a language model could generate from a task description alone. Unlike existing tools that focus on stylistic detection, VOLM extracts content at varying granularities, reconstructs it with an LLM, and compares these reconstructions to those derived from the task description. Evaluations across news articles, ICLR peer reviews, and argumentative essays show that VOLM can distinguish human-authored texts from LLM-generated ones while remaining robust to content-preserving transformations.

By Vibhhu Sharma, Thorsten Joachims, Sarah Dean
arXiv AI
Jul 28

VecTree-RAG: An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Combining Vector and Tree Retrieval for Efficiency and Accuracy

arXiv:2607. 23006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers.

By Xinyan Zhong, Yuwei Shi, Yuqi Wei, Chen Shen, Tianhang Zhou, Zhenghao Wu