← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Keqing Zhang, Jingyu Chen, Yufan Liu, Yongqiang Zhu, Nai Ding, Lai Jiang, Congyan Lang, Bing Li, Weiming Hu

Do LLMs Have Values? A Quantitative Analysis and Alignment Framework for Values in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) possess intrinsic value systems and how to quantify and align them. By projecting responses from 106 LLMs and 95,000 human survey profiles into a shared sociological space, the authors confirm that LLMs do have values, though these values form a concentrated, idealized core rather than mirroring human diversity. They introduce the Prior-Environment-Cognition (PEC) framework to mathematically define value expression and propose an adaptive Alignment Prescription that identifies minimal interventions—ranging from prompts to targeted parameter updates—to steer LLM values efficiently without harming general performance.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

VISTA: Steering LLMs with Latent User Values Inferred from a Few Survey Answers

VISTA is a method that steers large language models by inferring a latent user value profile from a few survey answers and applying a hypernetwork to generate user‑specific interventions. It outperforms or matches in‑context profiling on synthetic and real datasets (Food2D, World Values Survey, PrimeX) without adding prompt tokens. VISTA also adaptively selects which survey questions to ask, stopping after only 6% of the questionnaire while preserving 94% of the full‑history benefit, and identifies a clear value axis that accurately positions unseen users.

By Yinuo Xu, Jadie Adams, Brian Hu, Shivani Kumar, David Jurgens, Arslan Basharat
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

From Value Conditioning to Behavioral Shift: Lightweight Value Alignment of LLMs

The paper investigates whether fine‑tuning large language models (LLMs) on value survey responses can shift their value‑conditioned outputs and downstream behavior. Researchers first estimate baseline value profiles for several open‑source LLMs using the ten Schwartz values, then fine‑tune the models on survey‑style supervision that selectively alters target value ratings while preserving non‑target values. The resulting shifts are evaluated on held‑out survey questions and on out‑of‑domain behavioral proxies, such as a contextual moral‑judgment benchmark from Reddit AITA posts and a text‑based interactive decision‑making benchmark. The study finds that survey‑based supervision can change both survey responses and downstream behavior, but the transfer is strongly model‑ and value‑dependent and influenced by how value descriptions are framed.

By Shangrui Nie, Florian Mai, David Kacz\'er, Charles Welch, Zhixue Zhao, Lucie Flek
llmsfine-tuningbenchmarkssafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Predicting Alignment Generalization with Value Representations

The paper introduces the task of predicting alignment generalization, which measures how fine‑tuning a language model to follow a specific value affects its behavior across a broad set of other values. Through a large‑scale study of 66 values, the authors show that representations derived from model activations when applying values in context outperform textual description‑based methods, achieving a correlation of 0.45 versus 0.05. They further demonstrate that these representations can predict downstream robustness and help construct a taxonomy of LLM values based on empirical generalization dynamics.

By Andy Liu, Mehar Bhatia, Karolina Stanczak, Mona Diab, Vered Shwartz, Daniel Fried
llmsfine-tuningbenchmarkssafety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 16

Value Drifts: Tracing Value Alignment During LLM Post-Training

arXiv:2510. 26707v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As LLMs occupy an increasingly important role in society, they are more and more confronted with questions that require them not only to draw on their general knowledge but also to align with certain human value systems.

By Mehar Bhatia, Shravan Nayak, Gaurav Kamath, Marius Mosbach, Karolina Sta\'nczak, Vered Shwartz, Siva Reddy
llmsroboticsfine-tuningsafety
More like this →