arXiv AI
Do Factuality Methods Make LLMs More Factual? Reproducibility and Fair Comparison
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
5d ago
Do Factuality Methods Make LLMs More Factual? Reproducibility and Fair Comparison
The paper reproduces five factuality alignment methods for large language models—three on‑policy RL approaches (PPO, GRPO, Dr.GRPO) and two offline preference optimization methods (DPO, KTO)—using a common benchmark and evaluation metrics. None of the methods consistently outperforms the base model, and the rewards appear to favor format, length, or brevity rather than factuality or relevance. The study also highlights problems with current evaluation practices, noting that metrics and benchmarks often fail to measure prompt relevance and rely on fragile LLM judges and retrieval for verification.
arXiv AI
Sep 30
PADM\'E: Preference Alignment Data Synthesis for Meta-Evaluation of LM Agent Evaluators
PADM'E is a method for synthesizing preference‑aligned data to meta‑evaluate language‑model (LM) evaluators of agentic behaviors. It reframes meta‑evaluation as a preference judgment problem, generating criterion‑based data with small LMs and no human involvement. In a prototype, PADM'E produced 1,000 samples across four domains and three criteria, and human validation showed agreement with human judgment rising from 73% to 85% compared to a naive baseline.
arXiv AI
Jul 20
RLearner-LLM: Balancing Logical Grounding and Fluency in Large Language Models via Hybrid Direct Preference Optimization
arXiv:2605. 04539v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), the efficient alternative to PPO-based RLHF, falls short on knowledge-intensive generation: standard preference signals from human annotators or LLM judges exhibit a systematic verbosity bias that rewards fluency over logical correctness.
arXiv AI
Jul 23
Information Discernment in Large Language Models
arXiv:2607. 19355v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are increasingly used with external knowledge sources like the internet.
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31
Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation
The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) acting as judges for long-form text generation. It highlights that long-form evaluation requires complex, document-level assessments beyond simple length, such as organization, coverage, depth, consistency, and scenario-specific quality. Experiments show a significant reliability gap among current LLM judges, indicating instability across scenarios and limited effectiveness of rubrics or references.
arXiv AI
Jul 29
Less Data, Better Alignment: Data-Centric Multi-Evaluator Agreement for Preference Optimization
arXiv:2607. 25136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on preference optimization often varies the training objective while holding the data fixed.