arXiv AI By Ido Haber, Giulio Tononi

Do agents need to sleep?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper argues that large language model agents, which persist across sessions and accumulate memory, suffer from unchecked plasticity leading to semantic drift, retrieval errors, and memory saturation. It draws on a selectionist theory of sleep—comprising ringing, resonance, and renormalization—to propose that each phase can be implemented in digital memory systems. The authors predict that selectionist consolidation will outperform instructionist methods as memory stores grow, suggesting that sleep is a necessary cost of continuous learning under finite capacity.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Memory-Centric Continual Learning for AI Agents

Memory-Centric Continual Learning for AI Agents proposes a framework that redefines agent memory as a driver of future actions rather than a passive retrieval cache. It introduces a three-axis taxonomy—substrates, assets, and policies—to structure memory, a two-loop lifecycle for updating memory state and refining management policies, and an evaluation protocol that isolates genuine behavioral gains from simple context expansion. The paper also presents a memory scaling framework to model how performance scales with experience, storage, and compute across non-parametric and parametric memory.

By Dongfang Li, Zhuoen Chen, Bonian Jia, Zixuan Liu, Zhengxuan Lu, Can Deng, Yukun Shi, Yuhang Meng, Xin Zhang, Jiahe Huang, Fuhao Li, Junmai Wang, Shunyao Wen, Jingjun Sun, Jiaxu Tian, Jiangling Zhang, Zihan Wang, Liangyou Li, Yitong Yao, Shuangyong Song, Beilun Wang, Pengxu Wei, Hanlin Xu, Chang Liu, Yongxiang Li, Baotian Hu, Xiangyang Ji, Min Zhang