arXiv Machine Learning By Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chengye Wang, Li Zhang, Kaixiang Li, Yuyuan Li, Lingjuan Lyu, Chaochao Chen, Jianwei Yin

Generative Model Unlearning: A Survey through Target Events, Unlearning Operators, and Evaluation Protocols

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2507. 19894v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the rapid advancement of generative models, privacy, copyright, safety, and reliability risks have attracted growing attention.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Distribution Preference Optimization: A Fine-grained Perspective for LLM Unlearning

arXiv:2510. 04773v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities learned from vast corpora, concerns regarding data privacy and safety are receiving increasing attention.

By Kai Qin, Jiaqi Wu, Jianxiang He, Haoyuan Sun, Yifei Zhao, Xu Wang, Bin Liang, Yongzhe Chang, Cheng Li, Tiantian Zhang, Houde Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 11

Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs

The paper introduces Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer‑selective unlearning framework for large language models. FOM-UL uses a forget‑to‑retain significance score to identify transformer layers that strongly influence the forget set while being insensitive to the retain set, allowing targeted updates that preserve most of the model. Experiments on TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style benchmarks show that FOM-UL reduces residual memorization and maintains utility better than several baselines, even after 8‑bit and 4‑bit post‑training quantization, and it also limits recovery of forgotten content in adversarial prompt tests.

By Ravi Ranjan, Olivera Kotevska, Agoritsa Polyzou
arXiv AI
Sep 25

The Tokens Remember: When Tokenization Bypasses Knowledge Editing and Unlearning

The paper investigates how tokenization can undermine post‑release guarantees that sensitive knowledge has been edited or unlearned from open‑weight large language models. By showing that alternative valid tokenizations can bypass localized modifications, the authors introduce Toketive, a reference‑free attack that detects modified knowledge and reconstructs pre‑edit responses using only the released model. Experiments on five LLMs, six datasets, and six editing techniques reveal that 38.6% of alternative tokenizations recover suppressed information, with Toketive achieving high detection and reconstruction accuracy.

By Manit Baser, Aditya Nawal, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Mohan Gurusamy