arXiv Machine Learning
Disparate Impact in Synthetic Data Generation
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 11
Disparate Impact in Synthetic Data Generation
We revisit the fairness notion of disparate impact for synthetic data generation (SDG), that assesses whether the utility of generated records is the same across sensitive groups. Our approach departs from existing work on fair SDG, that address the problem of correcting for undue biases in the observed distribution, hence redefining SDG as learning a distribution that is not that of the real data.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 8
Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data
Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination against underrepresented groups.
arXiv AI
Jul 9
Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data
arXiv:2607. 07471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2
Portable Causal Fairness Across Synthetic Data Generator Families
The paper investigates how to maintain causal fairness when releasing synthetic data by applying the DECAF framework across nine different synthetic data generators from three families (marginals-based, GAN, and diffusion) and three levels of differential privacy. Experiments on Adult and COMPAS datasets show that the causal diffusion backbone consistently produces the fairest data with fidelity comparable to the marginals tier, while the fairness cuts have minimal impact on downstream classifier performance and do not degrade privacy guarantees.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4
Portable Causal Fairness Across Synthetic Data Generator Families
The paper demonstrates that causal fairness mechanisms can be applied across a wide range of synthetic data generators, including marginal‑based, GAN, and diffusion models, each with differentially private variants. By porting three fairness definitions to nine generators and testing them on Adult and COMPAS datasets, the authors show that the causal diffusion backbone consistently produces the fairest data releases while maintaining high fidelity. The fairness cuts have minimal impact on data quality, costing downstream classifiers only about $0.07$ to $0.15$ AUC on average, and adding privacy guarantees does not reduce fairness.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 8
SecretFan: Synthesizing Realistic Data without Breaking Privacy
arXiv:2602. 05833v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: There is a need for synthetic training and test datasets that replicate statistical distributions of original datasets without compromising their confidentiality.